Oncologist Speaks Out: COVID Vaccine Boosters and the Cancer Connection - A Medical Warning

Professor Angus Dalgleish, a clinical oncologist, experienced in prevention medicine with his opinions on mRNA technology and cancer.

Initial Background & Experience
I'm a clinical oncologist, and it's been a bit of a problem because I've been dismissed when I've said sensible things - "he's only a clinical doctor." But these people forget that I was there at the beginning with HIV and I was there in 1984 when Fauci promised a vaccine in 18 months time, and 40 years later, we still don't have it.

I was a co-discoverer of the CD4 receptor, which is how I got involved in COVID in the first place. My colleagues collaborators with whom we'd actually done a very good HIV vaccine - we've published everything on it, though it continues to be ignored for reasons I've only just started to realize more recently - were asked to help do a vaccine along the same lines. My first principle with vaccines is that less is more.

Early COVID Vaccine Development & Warnings
Everybody went for the spike protein. When they analyzed the spike protein, we found it had six inserts plus the furin cleavage site. The importance of this is these inserts all gave the virus a charge of a pH of 8 as opposed to normal of 6, which meant it was highly charged and acted like a fridge magnet going onto the fridge - really hyper-infectability for human cells.

We did blast analysis and pointed out the spike protein had 80% homology to human epitopes. Some of these were virtually 100%, like plate factor four, which would give you horrible plotting issues, and myelin, which would give you Gillian-Burry, etc. All these things have turned out to be true.

We prepared a document and gave it to our government. I know it was discussed in cabinet, went to Sage, Whitty and Badlands, and they all decided to ignore it. I was furious about that because we knew there would be significant side effects.

Concerns About Boosters & Cancer
At the Institute of Cancer Vaccines Immunotherapy, we have an adage that if a vaccine needs a booster, it doesn't work. My goodness, has that never been more true than in this case. The boosters were boosting against a virus that left the planet at least a year ago.

Because it was a Coxsackie virus, you get antigenic SYN or immunological imprinting. It doesn't matter how many variants you vaccinate against, the immune system only sees the first virus that's disappeared. It just produces lots of useless antibodies. More importantly, the booster suppresses the T-cell response.

Clinical Observations
I started to see in my melanoma clinic patients who'd been stable for years suddenly coming in relapsed. Sometimes the relapse was quite vicious. We're used to severe depression, divorce, death, bereavement, etc., suppressing the immune system and losing control of the cancers. But none of my patients had this. They'd all been bullied by their GPs to have a booster "just to be safe."

I found that there were a lot of people coming down with lymphomas, leukemias. All of them had the booster. I had three friends who only had the booster so they could travel after being locked down for two, three years. All three of them relapsed and two of them have died. We couldn't even treat these cancers - they didn't respond to the standard treatment.

Professional Response & Censorship
I've been carpeted by the hospital, been carpeted by the Royal College of Physicians, told to be quiet and that I'm upsetting the patients. I said, "No, I'm not upsetting the patients. I'm doing my job. First do no harm."

When I published my concerns and documented the T-cell suppression and immunoglobulins switch to tolerization, I got contacted from oncologists all over the world - Australia, South Africa, America, Canada, South America, Europe. They all said the same thing, and they all said that they were told it was just coincidence or selection of anecdotes and to be quiet.

Recent Developments & Mechanisms
There are now eight major described mechanisms for how messenger RNA booster vaccines can cause cancer. The most recent one shows the spike protein bound to p53, BRCA and MSH etc., which are suppressor genes. If you inactivate these, you can't control cancer - you're basically taking the police out. This was shown a couple of years ago but was withdrawn and retracted under severe pressure.

This binding of suppressor genes could lead to a tsunami of cancer in the next few years because if you've got an abnormality in the suppressor gene, you end up with cancer 10-20 years earlier than you normally would have had it.

Recommendations
The first thing I'd recommend is to ban all messenger RNA vaccines and ban the whole concept of giving a booster. There's no way these vaccines prevent infection. The more vaccines, the more likely you are to get COVID or some other dreadful infection or an exhaustive condition, Bell's palsy, shingles of other sites.