Calção Crio

🚨 Red Dye No. 3 BANNED by the FDA! 🚨
🍬 What’s the deal with Red 3?
For decades, this bright pink-red dye has been a sneaky ingredient in everything from candy and baked goods to cough syrups and vitamins. But here’s the kicker—scientific studies linked it to cancer in lab animals as far back as the '80s! It’s been banned in cosmetics for years, yet it’s still been in our kids’ snacks. 🤯
🎥 Why the change now?
Parents, holistic health advocates, and concerned consumers have been raising the alarm about Red 3 for years, citing health risks like hyperactivity in kids and its carcinogenic potential. The FDA is FINALLY catching up, but the fight isn’t over yet! Some industry reps are pushing back, claiming there’s “no credible safety concern.” 🤔
💡 What’s next for your favorite snacks?
Food manufacturers now need to reformulate their products—and some are already turning to natural alternatives like beets, red cabbage, and even insects for coloring. But Red 3 is still lurking in plenty of products, from candy corn and mashed potatoes to children’s nutritional shakes.
🛑 What can YOU do?
Keep an eye on labels, choose snacks with natural coloring, and stay informed. With this FDA decision and changes under new health secretary nominee Robert F. Kennedy Jr., we might see even more moves to cut artificial additives from our food supply.
🌱 It’s time to demand better, safer food for our families. Let’s celebrate this small victory and push for more change! 🎉
#reddye3 #fooddyes #holistichealth #rfk #trump #maha

✨ How Do You Approach Metastatic Endometrial Cancer Holistically? ✨
Endometrial cancer that has spread to the lungs can raise complex questions about treatment options. At Conners Clinic, we don’t treat just cancer—we support the whole person through a holistic approach that includes RIFE technology, personalized nutrition, and diet guidance, often in collaboration with your oncologist. Here’s what you need to know:
🔹 Understanding Metastasis: When cancer spreads, like from the endometrium to the lung, it remains the original cancer type. This means endometrial cells are now present in the lungs. Treatment should be based on your unique body profile and cancer behavior.
🔹 Hormone Therapy: Was the original tumor hormone receptor-positive? If so, a biopsy of the lung mass is essential to see if it’s still hormone-responsive—this can change over time.
🔹 Chemo & Other Options: We’re not anti-chemo, but we believe in integrating supportive therapies alongside any mainstream treatment you choose. Cancer journeys are personal, and your treatment should be, too.
Every situation is unique. Consult with a holistic practitioner who views your health as a comprehensive picture, not just a diagnosis. At Conners Clinic, we’re here to guide and support you on every step of your healing journey. 💪💚
📅 Watch Dr. Conners every Wednesday at 2 p.m. CT on our live Q&A for more insights on holistic cancer care! #endometrialcancer #metastasis #connersclinic #drkevinconners #alternativecancertreatment #holistichealth #maha

"In 2013, I faced a terrifying diagnosis—a rare tumor in my eye that left me 70% blind. The doctors told me I’d never get my vision back, and honestly, I didn’t see any other options. But a friend urged me to get a second opinion from Dr. Conners, saying, “What’s it going to hurt?”
From that first visit, it was clear that Dr. Conners wasn’t like anyone I’d worked with before. He used muscle testing to identify what he believed was the root cause—H. Pylori—and introduced me to something I’d never heard of: the Rife machine. He suggested an intense week of treatment: daily, eight-hour sessions. I thought, “What do I have to lose?”
By Friday, something miraculous happened. I could see again. My vision was back completely after just four sessions. Even my eye doctor was stunned when the scans showed no trace of the tumor. He doubted it would last, telling me I was just in remission and it would return. But weeks passed, and my vision held strong. I’d started using the Rife on my own, going deeper into my healing journey.
Working with Dr. Conners wasn’t just about treating symptoms. He focused on getting to the root cause, supporting me with supplements and natural treatments, and sticking with me through every stage of recovery. Over time, I tested clean on everything—no signs of H. Pylori, no more vision problems. It’s been an incredible journey of healing that I never thought possible, but it’s real. And I’m so grateful.
If you’re looking for answers that conventional medicine might not have, don’t be afraid to explore other perspectives. Sometimes, the healing path takes you where you least expect it.

In the world of medicine, the prevailing approach has been to focus on pathology, the study of disease.
This paradigm operates on the belief that by understanding the biochemical mechanisms behind diseases—like how serotonin levels affect depression, or the impact of LDL cholesterol on heart disease—we can develop drugs to interrupt these abnormal processes and, hopefully, cure or manage the diseases.
While this approach has its merits, particularly in emergency and acute care, it falls short in addressing chronic diseases.
The crux of the issue lies in the focus on combatting illness rather than fostering health.
The pursuit of health requires a different toolkit—one that emphasizes prevention and the nurturing of well-being.
To truly transform our health outcomes, we must shift our focus from merely studying disease to understanding and promoting the conditions for optimal health.
This isn't just about treating symptoms; it's about creating a foundation of wellness that can preempt disease altogether.
It's time to rethink our approach and prioritize the science of health creation over disease management.

Did you know that vaccines, unlike most other medications, don’t always undergo the same rigorous safety testing before being recommended for use? Over 72 vaccine doses are effectively required for American children, yet there’s no record of placebo-controlled, pre-licensing safety trials for any of them.
After years of research, lawsuits, and even a confrontation with top health officials, the truth is out: we still haven’t found a single trial that meets these criteria.
This isn’t about being anti-vaccine—it’s about demanding transparency and solid science. If we hold medications to high safety standards, why wouldn’t we do the same for vaccines?
Honest science is essential for public trust. Let’s have a real conversation about accountability in health policies. What are your thoughts?